Grant funding, by definition, is to be used "for the
public good". That is the
definition of a nonprofit. If the money
were yours to use when and where you wish, you would be a for-profit.
You may feel that any money you receive will ultimately go
toward accomplishing your mission, but there are normally very specific
expectations for how the funds are used.
Struggling nonprofits sometimes fall into a habit that at
the very least will assure they lose support in the future. They receive a restricted grant, but spend
the money for things other than what they outlined in their grant
application.
If you need operating funds, that is what your grant application
should request. If you applied for
funding to purchase specific items, or provide specific services, you
absolutely can't use it to pay your other bills without the grantor's permission.
Even some supposedly "unrestricted" grant funding
should usually be related to mission-specific spending. If you suddenly find that you don't need all
of the money for the specific purpose for which it was requested, you can
either return the excess to the grantor, or apply to them to shift it to another
program. If you have any doubts about
what the grantor or donor meant by "unrestricted" you should be sure
that you clarify the meaning.
Aside from losing the trust of your grantor, you may also be
criminally liable, if the grantor can prove you "knowingly and deliberately"
received funds that you knew you were going to spend on something else. Most courts view that as fraud.
Tracking the uses of grant funding is a necessity. Be sure you can prove that you spent it on the right things.
No comments:
Post a Comment