When you are presenting your charity to a prospective
supporter, particularly if that first contact is an online application,
establishing the credibility and effectiveness of the organization is vital.
When reviewing grant proposals for clients, many of them are
written in the first person. "I started XYZ Charities" "I contacted so-and-so", I did this
and I did that. Almost as bad is a
constant string of third-person references to the founder.
There is always one person behind the formation of a charity. Someone has to get the ball rolling, and that
founder is very important. If the
charity achieves longevity, it will always be tied to its founder. The Red Cross will always owe its existence to
Clara Barton as the founder. Any history
of a charity will include a nod to its founder, but there does come a time when
that same founder has to be part of a team.
Grantors are interested in supporting an organization
because it effectively advances its mission, and that requires the efforts of
more than one person.
If your grant application reads more like a political
campaign speech than a mission narrative, it might give grantors the idea that
the charity can't survive without you, or worse, that there are no other active
team members.
When the grant asks for a history of your organization, it's
fine to say it was founded by so-and-so, and if that person is still active, a
brief biographical sketch of that persons contributions and qualifications. The
transition to a team philosophy should be introduced as soon as possible after
that initial introduction.
Try something like this.
XYZ Charities was founded in 2005
by Mary Doe, and now operates with a team that includes Joe Doe, Nancy Roe and
Frank Moe, adding the titles and qualifications after each name. That tells
grantors immediately that you are no longer a one-man show. If you should get hit by a bus, the charity
can continue to function, and the money the grantor is investing will not be
lost or wasted.
The old cliché "You only get one chance to make a first
impression" applies in spades here.
Be sure that impression is about your organization, and not just you.
No comments:
Post a Comment