Is your grants dept.ready for the election?

OK.   I can hear it now.

OMG!  Enough about the cotton-picking election already!

Seriously though, if your nonprofit depends on government grants, and even if it doesn't, now might be the time to put some "what-if" scenarios in place.

In case you are new to the world of grants, an awful lot of the funding tends to follow what's hot politically and tails off when it comes to what's not.

For instance, if the Democrats retain the White House, you can expect that all of the current funding for STEM, social justice issues and the like will continue and even accelerate.

Conversely, if the Republicans win, their pet projects will receive the bulk of the funding.

If you're saying "Well, we get all of our money through private funding" you still need to look ahead.

While it's unlikely that Dems would immediately get a 90% income tax rate in place, there is little doubt that the wealthiest Americans are going to take a hit in the pocketbook.

Who funds private foundations? The wealthiest Americans.

Of course all the politicians would love to have us believe that all of the "new" revenue streams they are cultivating will be immediately returned to the people in the form of better jobs, or free college, or a host of other voter-friendly  programs.

The truth is, it just never works out that way.

For one thing, there's that little thing called the national debt, currently headed north of 18 Trillion dollars.

 

It's a funny thing, but when people (or governments) lend money they usually expect to be paid back.

Interest payments on that money are forecast to eat up ONE TRILLION dollars in just five more years.

That's up nearly 5 times from $220 Billion reported for  2012. If we do in fact add all of the free stuff envisioned by the Democrats, the debt amount could double again in just ten years.

Not paying that amount isn't an option. Given that many of the current and proposed entitlement programs are forecast to grow exponentially simply due to having more users, it stands to reason that discretionary spending will suffer at every level.

No matter which party wins out in 2016, the funding landscape is sure to change in the next decade.

The nonprofits and small businesses that weather the storm will be the ones that plan for it now.

If you are just thinking of starting a nonprofit, it might behoove you to either wait a year or so, or at least run two opposing SWOT analyses before jumping in with both feet.

If you are an existing organization, you may want to factor in significantly higher costs and lower revenue projections when evaluating old programs and before launching new ones.

Another trend may be that local governments will be looking for revenue of their own to replace any missing Federal dollars.  That could lead to the repeal of many of the traditional nonprofit perks, including tax breaks for property used for charitable purposes.

In spite of the handwriting on the wall, many nonprofits will choose to wait to plan until it is too late.

 

Don't let your organization be one of those wringing your hands and holding "going out of business" sales.   

Working harder to get government dollars

According to an article on a report published by the Urban Institute, over half of all nonprofits reported lower payments and difficulties with nonprofit/government funding partnerships in a survey conducted in 2013. Some reported that funding simply dried up while the programs were still ongoing.

Considering that government at all levels was funding over 56,000 nonprofits through over 350,000 grants and contracts  and was spending over $137 billion dollars doing so, that has an impact.

Governments don't create wealth themselves. They collect wealth by means of the taxes they collect or the fees they charge, and redistribute it.

Without getting too far off into the political weeds, the simple answer is that there is less money available and the government has never been particularly good at working with the people they give it to at any level. Add in the bad publicity they have created through failed programs and scandal-plagued, sloppy accountability and the money supply is bound to get even tighter.

Governments are not going to stop handing out money. Not only is it the way they garner support (votes) for their initiatives, but they aren't supposed to just sit on the money they receive.

Still, with the national debt still rising, unemployment still a problem, and workers contributing less taxes due to working fewer hours, the money supply is going to get tighter.

The savvy nonprofit will have to tighten up their operations and their belts to get by, and consider diversifying their funding plans. Since late and reduced payments were a problem for many organizations, increasing cash on hand and developing alternate income strategies should be in the forefront of coping strategies.

In the aforementioned report it is noted that nonprofits coped with funding shortfalls by reducing staff, freezing wages or drawing down reserves. It may also behoove them to take a look at reducing the scope of their programs as well. If program and financial reporting can be tightened up to reflect greater oversight and increased effectiveness, now would certainly be the time to implement those new controls.

Basic business and strategic operational planning will be more important than ever in at least  the next decade. Scaling back programs or accessing more foundation and corporate funding may have to figure more prominently in that planning that it has in the past.

If you haven't already done so, consider a re-assessment of your current business and funding plans.  Better to help a little less than go out of business and help no one.

If you need help, either with research or program narratives and reporting, drop me a line at granthelp@ida.net

How does the Washington drama affect government grants?

In the short term the U.S. government is a non-functioning entity, rather more so than usual. Due to the debt limit/shutdown situation, if you go to most of their websites you will get a message saying the website is not being maintained due to the shutdown.

Grants.gov is still displaying, but a highlighted post from their blog indicates there could be problems due to staffing shortfalls in various departments. Of course, appropriations are still to be decided, so that may cause some funding changes when the current shutdown is resolved. Some current funding may be held up as well.

Whenever there is a potential disruption in the free flow of money from Washington, some pundit opines that this will be the end of some or all Federal grant money. That sort of sounds like wishful thinking or a political attempt to add to the fear factor.

The government is not likely to end the granting programs unless we truly do go bankrupt as a nation. Grants are the way that Washington furthers its social policies. Whatever the dominant party in power, the government "gives away money" to achieve some desired goal.

Individual departments within the government are subject to the whims of the majority party. Whether  they are pushing for aid to countries outside the U.S., education, housing, healthcare, or the arts, there will be a lot of money allocated to advancing those programs. Some individual programs may be cancelled, but only because they do not fit in the current administration's scheme of things. Some programs may be moved from grant status to competitive bidding contracts.

Grants and any other kind of federal funding is somewhat dependent on the supply of money, sometimes as a high priority, and sometimes not, but throughout our history, the Feds have funneled some funds back to groups that can advance the agenda du jour.

Forecasting where that money is going to go is far more important to nonprofits in the short term than worrying about whether the supply line is going to be shut off forever. If all grants do end, that will be the least of our worries.