Your small nonprofit has a three-year plan to create, manage
and expand services for a program. Your estimate is that it will require $500,000
to fund the program for three years. Your average annual revenue is about
$100,000. What's next?
The first place most nonprofits turn to for funding is THE
GRANT. You know, that single-source, highly committed funding partner that can
make this program a reality. I work with quite a few organizations that start
out with the idea that one grant is the only acceptable outcome. About 1% of the time it actually works out
that way.
There are definitely big foundations out there that can fund
at this level, and some of them actually will spread the funding out over three
years. The trick is to make them want to support your program.
The hardest part of expanding from a small nonprofit to a
bigger nonprofit is funding. Big foundations tend to support big nonprofits,
and they almost never want to be your sole source of funding. So the first step
is to give up. No really…you have to give up the idea that one grantor is going
to be your angel investor. You are going to have to approach several possible
partners, and you may have to fund your program in phases.
The first thing you have to do is have a rock-solid program strategy.
Big foundations didn't get that way by chasing rainbows. They have great name
recognition because the programs they support get results, the uses of the
funds are well documented, and the outcomes are measurable.
If you haven't done a feasibility study on the program you
must start there, and all the data needs to be verifiable. Who or what will the
program benefit, how will it benefit them, what kind of reports or research
will you employ to measure
effectiveness, what resources do you already have to get started (including
human resources)? Start by proving your statement
of need and detailing your method to measure outcomes. When I am working with an organization, this seems to be the part that causes the most heartburn. What's good enough for your board meeting is probably not going to measure up with a major grantor.
You have to have realistic budget figures. If you say that
you need $100,000 for equipment, list it with price estimates in detail. In
construction or manufacturing, they call this a bill of materials. What do you
need, what benefit is it to the program, when do you need it, and what will it
cost? Is it a consumable (paper, ink, food)
or is it a depreciable acquisition (building, racking, vehicle,
server)? Is it a subcontracted
service? Is any of it potentially or
actually going to retained past the life of the funding cycle? Even if the initial grant application or LOI
doesn't request this much detail at first, you will have to produce it
eventually, and it will be useful during the program as well.
How much of your own existing funding are you going to
invest in this program? Don't forget
that volunteers can often be used as matching capital. They have a monetary
value.
Don't try to hide normal operating costs in the program. If
you are expecting some of the money to be used for program-related additional daily
costs (such as an increase in utility costs, fuel or supplies) be sure that you
keep the two classifications separate. It is perfectly fine to include things
such as utility costs in a grant request, as
long as they are program-related. It is not OK to expect the grant to pay
your normal operating costs unless you disclose that up front.
It should go without saying, but if you are already
operating in the red, you don't stand a ghost of a chance of getting funding. Audited financials that show
enough existing income to keep the doors open are a must.
Along with that premise, if you are a truly tiny
organization, with revenue under $50,000, there is little chance that you will
receive major funding for a big program. You would be far better off to scale
back your plans to something that local foundations can get on board with,
succeed with those and build your revenues and donor relations to the point
that you can move up to bigger programs. Many foundations do not even accept
the e-postcard as a valid 990 filing, because they know that means you don't
have a lot of capital to invest in a big program.
A major funding campaign is a lot of work. It will cost
money up front. Be sure that you can sustain the effort before you invest too
much time or money into it. Some very large foundations will tell you right on
their website that they can only fund about 10 or 20 percent of the requests
they receive. Do your homework, qualify the foundation as a viable candidate to
approach, and don't assume that because your program is worthy it will be
funded. Sometimes, the best outcome will only be getting on that particular
foundation's radar for a future year.
No comments:
Post a Comment